Between “e-leadership” and artificial intelligence, keys to understanding postmodern armed conflicts

Importance attached knowledge has always been and will be a reason for study, if we consider who performs it transforms the dynamics of the relationship with the people under his responsibility and therefore the organization as a whole.

Much has been written on this subject, especially p leadership associated with military field or with what accrues to public persons holding relevant offices. Then there are a number of approaches that try to adjective the term in an attempt to distinguish one from the other.

as a result There are those who speak of transformational, distributed, competitive or principle-centered leadership.. Regardless of whether it is the most prominent quality or characteristic of the profile of the person who must lead, technology has always had an impact and will continue to do so throughout the process that comprises a leader’s decision-making.

Currently, the exponential development of science along with the development of new communication and information exchange systemsas well as the control and management of big data, have become a crucial point and determining factor for making decisions with the highest degree of certainty.

A technological revolution that involves unprecedented forms of transformation of human actions where the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) As a disruptive milestone, even greater than that brought about by the Internet, it has begun to deepen the capabilities and attitudes of the military leader in the face of the challenges posed by the operational environment of new armed conflicts.

In terms of certainty and accuracy in AI decision-making, it not only contributes to building trust within and outside the organization itself, making it even more trustworthy, but also enables each member of the parts that make up its various subsystems is empowered to the point of creating a unique and unique synergy which supports the organizational structure itself and makes it more effective, a synergy where excellence, innovation and foresight are key concepts for any organization’s survival on the battlefield.

As for the warlords, it must be resolved in the face of dizzying actions within an all-out war scenario of uncertain developmentframed by a complex environment of multidimensional space where “fog of war”, first stated by the Prussian soldier Carl von Clausewitz, is being shaped by the modern concept coined the “grey zone”.

As a result, the lethality and stealth provided by kinetic and non-kinetic fires assume extreme importance, as well as the resilience of units in combat, tactical and logistical autonomy, and rapid movements that accelerate the assembly and dispersion of military units to improve the relative position they occupy vis-à-vis their adversary.

In this highly dynamic framework, characterized by the decentralization of military operations within the so-called the “Mosaic War” model.the commander will require different leadership than in past decades. The hard skills previously required for this military leader have given way to the need for greater soft skills. Linear analysis underpinned circular analysis, and lateral thinking proved a unique trait for solving complex operational military problems typical of “postmodern warfare.”

However, the greatest problem facing the contemporary leader is not the accumulation of information he receives and how he deals with it, a product of belief that provokes struggle, but the ability that the system itself has to absorb, to process. compare it with another source that confirms its credibility and give you an answer as soon as possible to present a potential solution.

Therein lies the importance of AI. An intelligence that began to displace old models of decision-making and found its limit only in the professional ethics and moral values ​​that define a true and authentic leader.. An artificial intelligence with a response speed greater than any human brain that allows us to maintain a competitive advantage over those who do not use it to a large extent, which makes us happy to take the initiative and then stimulate the adversary’s response based on our own interests. .

As a result, the “OODA” cycle, characterized by observation, orientation, decision and action, together with the possibility of surveillance and control through artificial intelligence and other new technologies in computing and communication, appears to be an inevitable need.

The reality of constant technological progress is changing the nature of war. To deny this would be to ignore and turn our backs on this new era where armed conflicts are developing, which also leads to a new type of leadership, which, conditioned by the dominance of battlefield digitization, some authors allowed themselves to name “e-leadership” and included it in the era of “digital warfare”..

The technological revolution that society as a whole is experiencing in the fields of communication, data processing and transmission, artificial intelligence, robotics and unmanned air, land and sea vehicles has also been carried over to the battlefield.

Thanks to quantum processing of information, we can see the distant discussions we once had about them “age of knowledge”. Although this classification only served academics to examine and analyze the causes and possible consequences in search of a better response to adapt to an increasingly complex world with greater challenges, it was not eliminated, but rather still, merged with a great wave or new age that embraces, completes, and improves it, such as artificial intelligence.

As more and more armed forces continue to transform by adopting innovative and creative weapon systems, where various technologies and platforms continue to evolve and proliferate at an unprecedented scale, they are developing adaptive military leaders with capabilities commensurate with the challenges, risks, and threats presented by postmodern warfare. It would seem like a difficult task, though It is essential to acquire these skills to continue to act as a deterrent in a volatile global context.in which competition between states reemerged with renewed vigor and violence.